| | | | | |
a. forms of scholarship accepted
The Cambridge Law Review accepts Articles, Case Comments, and Essays. Book Reviews are not accepted.
Short Articles: These are shorter pieces of original scholarship between 4,000 and 7,000 words (inclusive of footnotes). Short Articles tend to be more narrowly focused than full length, Long Articles.
Long Articles: These are full-length pieces of original scholarship typically ranging from 10,000 to 14,000 words (inclusive of footnotes).
Case Comments: These are shorter pieces of original scholarship. Case Comments should not be mere summaries of a case; they should be analytical and bring an interesting or new perspective. We prefer Case Comments on newer cases, but we also welcome Case Comments that take a new approach to, or shed new light on, an important older case.
We welcome submissions on English law, the law in other common law jurisdictions, European law, and international law. We prefer, but do not require, that submissions have some connection with English law. Our most important criteria for publication is that your submission relates to a contemporary legal issue, though we will also consider outstanding historical or jurisprudential pieces. As far as possible, your submission should aim to provide critical insight into the area of law you have chosen.
c. citations and formatting
The Cambridge Law Review uses the following style guides:
From the outset, your submission should be fairly compliant with OSCOLA, though it need not be perfectly so. Your submission need not be compliant with the Redbook’s formatting style; if your submission is selected for publication, it will be edited to match the Redbook.
d. submission and review process
Please make your submission using the form available here, and ensure that you have filled in all relevant sections of the submission form. Please remove any identifying information (name, university, acknowledgements, etc.) from the Microsoft Word document containing your submission in order to facilitate our blind review process.
The Cambridge Law Review reviews all submissions carefully, and our editing process is intensive. All submissions will be read by multiple members of the Editorial Board. Shortlisted pieces will then be read by the Managing Board to select the final pieces for publication. The reviewing editors will not be aware of the name, credentials, or academic institution of an author. We will notify all authors of the status of their submission after we have finalised the selected pieces for publication.
If your submission is accepted for publication, the Managing Board, Editorial Board and members of the Honorary Board may suggest structural and substantive changes where necessary. After such changes are made (if any), we will work with you to edit and prepare your piece for publication.
The Cambridge Law Review does not accept submissions that are being considered by other journals or law reviews. Authors must agree not to submit pieces submitted to the Cambridge Law Review for consideration to any other journal, law review, or blog until the end of the review cycle (at the end of February for submissions made to Volume V, Issue 1; and until the middle of August for submissions made to Volume V, Issue 2). Submissions made to multiple journals will not be considered for publication.
A PDF copy of these Guidelines is available here.